Episode 124: Piers Plowman and the Peasant Revolt

The 14th century poem called Piers Plowman has intrigued and perplexed readers for over six centuries. In the 14th century, it was embraced by peasants who used it as inspiration in their struggle against the upper classes of England. That struggle culminated in a major peasant uprising in the early 1380s. In this episode, we explore the connections between Piers Plowman and the Peasant Revolt.

5 thoughts on “Episode 124: Piers Plowman and the Peasant Revolt

  1. How significant were the differences between the pronunciation of “bread” and “cheese” between Middle English and the Dutch language at the time? I ask because shibboleths, the language based identification technique you described are an ancient and unreliable method of identifying the “enemy”; Gideon from the Book of Judges is described as using this technique. Often it results in tragedy such as the 1937 Parsley Massacre in the Dominican Republic. In that event Dominican soldiers held sprigs of parsley in front of alleged Haitians living in the border region of the island. If the victims identified the plant as “perejil,” the Spanish word, they would be spared. But if they used the term “Persil” which is French/Creole, they would be killed.

    • I think there was a significant difference in the pronunciation of “cheese,” but there was some difference in the pronunciation of “bread” as well. As noted in the episode, that particular discussion was derived from the Chronicles of London. I am not sure how literal to take that quote, however. It is possible that the chronicle author just used that linguistic example to emphasize that Flemings were targeted due to their different manner of speech.

        • First, “adverb” is a word that serves as a “catch-all” category rather than one specific part of speech; I assume, however, that you are talking about the “-ly” ending typically added to adjectives when they modify adjectives, verbs, or other adverbs. (You also say that “Americans use nouns instead adverbs,” but I think that you mean “adjectives instead of adverbs.” That said, English does tend to use nouns in a modifying capacity, though that discussion is separate from the one at hand.)

          But take the beginning of the above segment: should I have said “firstly” instead of “first,” or is the adjectival construction acceptable? For me, formal rules for language are generally only useful for formal settings; otherwise, if you understand the speaker, who cares?

          The use of adjectives as adverbs is not uncommon in many languages, English included. In fact, traditionally, most Germanic languages do not distinguish between adjectival and adverbial forms of words, and there’s extensive examples of this in English dating back to Old English; Dutch and German largely still have the same forms for adjectives and their corresponding adverbs.

          Turning back to the use of nouns as modifiers, though, Germanic languages do make use of nouns as modifiers (“noun adjuncts”); while that’s not quite “nouns instead of adverbs,” take a look at this article for some explanation, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noun_adjunct

        • There was no particular reason for using “literal” in the comment above. “Literally” would be correct using the traditional rules of grammar, but in the context of the sentence, “literal” is commonly used in American English.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.